Advertisement

Urolithiasis

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 549–558 | Cite as

Antilithiatic effects of crocin on ethylene glycol-induced lithiasis in rats

  • Fatemeh Abbasi Ghaeni
  • Bahareh Amin
  • Alireza Timcheh Hariri
  • Naser Tayyebi Meybodi
  • Hossein Hosseinzadeh
Original Paper

Abstract

In this study, the antilithiatic potential of crocin, a pharmacologically active constituent of Crocus sativus L. (saffron), was evaluated against ethylene glycol (EG)-induced nephrolithiasis in rats. Negative control rats were provided with EG (1 %) in drinking water for 30 days. crocin (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered simultaneously once daily for 30 days (prophylactic regimen) or 14 days after stone induction (therapeutic study). For biochemical analysis, 24-h urine was collected from all experimental animals at the beginning (day 0) and end of the experiment (day 30). The urine output was evaluated during the first 24 h (day 1). Ethylene glycol feeding resulted in decreased hyperoxaluria (P < 0.01) and total protein loss (P < 0.001), along with decreased excretion of citrate and magnesium (P < 0.01) compared with the intact animals. Treatment with prophylactic regimen of crocin (20 and 40 mg/kg) significantly reduced the elevated oxalate, and increased the citrate and magnesium levels of urine. The attenuation of protein loss was only seen with a high dose of crocin in a prophylactic study. Urine volume was not significantly altered after EG or crocin administration. The increased number of calcium deposits in the kidney tissue of lithiatic rats was decreased after prophylactic treatment with 20 and 40 mg/kg of crocin. The urinary ionic parameters and crystal count were not significantly altered after the therapeutic study. A marked increase in malondialdehyde (MDA, a lipid peroxidation product) level was observed in the EG-given group. Treatment with crocin (20 and 40 mg/kg) reduced the elevated levels of MDA. Results indicate that crocin can be effective in preventing urine calculi formation and recurrence of the disease. The mechanism underlying this effect is mediated possibly through balancing promoter and inhibitor factors and an antioxidant effect.

Keywords

crocin Saffron Kidney stone Hyperoxaluria Nephrolithiasis Calcium oxalate Ethylene glycol 

Introduction

Urinary tract stones (urolithiasis) are the third prevalent disorder affecting the urinary system. This disorder arises as a result of a cascade of events initiated by supersaturation, crystal nucleation, growth, aggregation, retention and migration to the renal papillary surfaces [1, 2]. Almost 80 % of all kidney stones are predominately composed of CaOx [3]. High recurrence rate of this disorder is worrying and long-term treatment strategies have been inadequate [4, 5].

For years, medicinal plants have become an important source of new chemical substances with potential therapeutic effects.

Saffron, the dried stigmas of Crocus sativus L., (family, Iridaceae), is native to the Mediterranean environment and widely cultivated in Iran [6]. Traditionally, this plant has been used as a colorant and seasoning in food. Moreover, in folklore medicine, saffron has been used in numerous illnesses including cough, asthma, menstruation problems, insomnia, pain, colic, chronic uterine hemorrhage, painful urination, kidney stone, cardiovascular disorders and tumors [7, 8, 9]. Avicenna, a Persian physician and the most famous philosopher–scientist of the Islamic world, described the details of a remedy, consisting of saffron plus honey, prescribed to facilitate the passage of kidney stones [10]. Saffron extracts and its active constituents, safranal and crocin, have shown anti-cancer [11, 12], antioxidant [13], hypolipidemic and insulin resistance improvement [14], protection against cisplatin-induced acute renal failure [15], and anti-convulsant [16], anti-depressant [17, 18], anti-anxiety [19], anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory properties [20, 21, 22]. In this study we investigated the possible effect of crocin, a main water-soluble carotenoid of C. sativus as a preventive or curative agent against ethylene glycol-induced lithiasis using male Wistar rats.

Materials and methods

Materials

Hydrochlorothiazide was donated by Darupaksh Pharmaceutical Co., Tehran, Iran. Potassium citrate was purchased from Sepidaj Pharmaceutical Co., Tehran, Iran. Ethylene glycol (EG) was provided by Merck (Germany). Malondialdehyde was obtained from Fluca (Switzerland). Thiobarbituric acid (TBA) was purchased from Merck (Germany). crocin was extracted in our laboratory and purified [23]. The purity of crocin crystals was tested with HPLC and was more than 90 % [23]. The applied doses of crocin were based on previous studies [19, 24]. crocin and standard drugs were dissolved in normal saline and given once daily by the intraperitoneal (i.p.) route.

Animals

Male Wistar rats with the weight range of 190–200 g were obtained from the animal house of the school of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. They were maintained under a 12 h light–dark cycle environment. Animals had access to food and water ad libitum throughout the study. All the procedures were approved by Mashhad University of Medical Sciences and followed the internationally accepted Principles for Laboratory Animal Use and Care [25].

Experimental design

Ethylene glycol-induced hyperoxaluria model [3] was used to induce nephrolithiasis. Animals were randomly divided into ten groups of six rats each. Rats serving as intact control group received tap drinking water for 30 days.

Untreated control group received intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of normal saline (2.5 ml/kg) along with renal lithogenic treatment containing 1 % v/v ethylene glycol (EG) for 30 days.

Positive control group received co-treatment of potassium citrate (2.5 g/kg) and 1 % v/v EG from the 1st day to 30th day of calculi induction [26]. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ, 10 mg/kg, i.p.), as a diuretic drug, plus EG (1 % v/v) for 30 days was chosen for measuring diuretic activity. Prophylactic groups of study received crocin, 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg respectively, concomitant with 1 % v/v EG from the 1st day to 30th day of calculi induction. Curative groups of study received 1 % v/v EG from the 1st day to 30th day of study with crocin at doses of 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg administered from the 14th day to 30th day of calculi induction.

Collection and analysis of urine

For assessment of diuretic activity, the volume of total urine excreted out during the first 24 h after lithogenic treatment or day 1 was determined [27].

All animals were kept separately in metabolic cages and 24 h urine samples were collected on 0, 1 and 30th day of calculi induction treatment. Following volume determination of urine, samples were stored at −20 °C and those collected on days 0 and 30 were analyzed for PH, oxalate, phosphate, uric acid, citrate, magnesium and total protein (Darman Cov, Ltd, Iran) according to manufacturer’s protocol.

Collection and analysis of tissue for histological assays

After the last urine collection, the kidneys were isolated from killed animals and washed in ice‐cold saline. The right kidneys were fixed in 10 % neutral buffered formalin. The 5 μm-thick sections were stained via a hematoxylin and eosin solution and examined by light microscopy. Calcium oxalate deposits of slides were randomly counted using an Olympus microscope, type BX 40, with a magnification of 40×. As described previously, a sagittal section of each kidney sample was divided into eight equal-sized parts by four virtual lines, to count the number of crystalline deposits, as shown in Fig. 1 [28]. The total number of CaOx deposits in each sample was reported as average of the eight readings. The histological slides were examined by a pathologist who was blind to the experiment.
Fig. 1

Four virtual lines divide each kidney sagittal section into eight equal parts

Collection and analysis of tissue for determination of lipid peroxidation

Antioxidant potential of crocin was estimated by its inhibitory effect against lipid peroxidation induced in the kidney homogenate by measuring MDA concentration, according to Uchiyama et al. [29] procedure. Following decapitation, the left kidney was rapidly removed, washed in ice‐cold saline and immersed in liquid nitrogen. Frozen samples were homogenized (10 % w/v) in 2 ml of 1.15 % w/v potassium chloride solution. 3 ml of phosphoric acid (1 % w/v) and 1 ml of TBA (0.6 % w/v) were added to 0.5 ml of homogenate in a centrifuge tube. After stirring, all samples and standards (a set of MDA standards over the concentration range of 0–50 nmol/ml) were heated at 100 °C for 45 min. After cooling, 4 ml of n-butanol was added to the mixture and vortex mixed for 1 min, followed by centrifugation at 3,000 rpm for 15 min. The butanol layer was transferred to a fresh tube and its absorbance was read at 525 nm. The levels of MDA were expressed as nmol/mg of tissue.

Statistical analysis

The results were expressed as mean ± standard error mean (SEM). The statistical significance was assessed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni’s comparison test or by paired t test. P values less than 0.05 were considered as significant. The crystal deposit number was analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s pairwise comparison. The Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS® for Windows, release 13) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Effect on the urine output

Determination of the first 24 h (day 1) urine output revealed that the diuretic drug, HCTZ (10 mg/kg), increased the urine volume as compared to lithiatic and intact control groups (P < 0.01). As shown in Table 1, crocin at the administered doses in this study did not show a diuretic effect after 24 h of stone induction compared to lithiatic control.
Table 1

Effect of crocin on the urinary volume of lithiatic animals

Group (n = 6)

Intact control

Lithiatic or negative control

Positive control (K citrate, 2.5 g/kg)

Diuretic drug (HCTZ, 10 mg/kg)

Prophylactically treated with crocin (10 mg/kg)

Prophylactically treated with crocin (20 mg/kg)

Prophylactically treated with crocin (40 mg/kg)

Curatively treated with crocin (10 mg/kg)

Curatively treated with crocin (20 mg/kg)

Curatively treated with crocin (40 mg/kg)

Volume (ml)

 Day 0

3.4 ± 2.5

3.7 ± 1.9

3.1 ± 1.7

6.1 ± 0.8

4.7 ± 3.1

5.6 ± 2.7

6.3 ± 2.4

7.5 ± 4.4

7.9 ± 6.2

5.4 ± 2.2

 Day 1

4.7 ± 1.6

3.5 ± 1.1

4.6 ± 1.9

10.25 ± 2*

5.4 ± 2.4

6.8 ± 2.1

6.1 ± 1.9

7.4 ± 2.8

6.1 ± 2.8

6.2 ± 2.3

 Day 30

3.37 ± 2.4

8.2 ± 6.2

6 ± 3.36

8.2 ± 1.1

7.7 ± 3.5

5.25 ± 3.8

8.2 ± 3.9

8.9 ± 2.3

9.2 ± 3.8

7.8 ± 3.8

Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. ANOVA with repeated measure followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. All compounds were administered by the intraperitoneal route

* P < 0.01 indicates significant change in comparison to lithiatic control group by two-way ANOVA

Although the urinary volume of lithiatic animals increased on day 30 after the stone-inducing treatment by EG, it was not significant compared to day 0 and the intact control group. The urinary output at this time on treatment with crocin also showed no statistically significant change compared to the lithiatic control group (Table 1).

Effect on the urinary parameters

No difference in biochemical parameters was found among the groups on day 0. As a result of stone induction with EG, there was an increased oxalate excretion in lithiatic rats on the 30th day as compared to day 0 and normal control group (P < 0.05, P < 0.01 respectively). However, the prophylactic regimen of crocin (20 and 40 mg/kg) for 1 month significantly prevented the elevated levels of urinary oxalate excretion (Table 2). Low dose of crocin (10 mg/kg) failed to exhibit significant reduction in urinary oxalate excretion. In a curative study, crocin did not significantly decrease urinary oxalate, compared to the stone-inducing group (Table 2). After 30 days of stone induction, urinary pH in nephrolithiasic animals treated with normal saline showed no significant change in comparison to the intact control group. There was also no appreciable change to the urinary PH of animals treated with crocin to that of lithiatic or intact control groups (Table 2).
Table 2

Effect of crocin on urinary oxalate, phosphate and total protein levels in urolithiasis-induced rats

Group (n = 6)

Intact control

Lithiatic or negative control

Positive control (K citrate, 2.5 g/kg)

Prophylactically treated with crocin (10 mg/kg)

Prophylactically treated with crocin (20 mg/kg)

Prophylactically treated with crocin (40 mg/kg)

Curatively treated with crocin (10, mg/kg)

Curatively treated with crocin (20 mg/kg)

Curatively treated with crocin (40 mg/kg)

PH

Day 0

6.7 ± 1.3

6.4 ± 1.2

6.7 ± 1.2

6.5 ± 1.1

6. 6 ± 1.5

6. 4 ± 1.5

6.6 ± 1.8

6.3 ± 1.6

6.7 ± 1.8

Day 30

6.3 ± 1.8

6.5 ± 1.8

6.7 ± 1.3

6.1 ± 1.7

6. 7 ± 1.6

6. 3 ± 1.2

6.5 ± 2.1

6 ± 2.7

6.8 ± 1.8

Oxalate (mg/24 h)

Day 0

1.05 ± 0.6**

1.16 ± 1.4

1.35 ± 0.6

1.5 ± 1.0

1.9 ± 0.5

1.84 ± 0.2

1.7 ± 0.9

1.96 ± 0.9

1.63 ± 0.9

Day 30

1.2 ± 0.9**

5.2 ± 3.7#

1.5 ± 0.6**

2.5 ± 1.1

2.05 ± 1.6*

2.09 ± 0.9*

2.9 ± 1.3

3.1 ± 1.5

2.8 ± 0.7

Phosphate (mg/24 h)

Day 0

3.55 ± 0.5

4.3 ± 0.4

3.03 ± 0.4

3.03 ± 0.5

3.2 ± 0.54

3.3 ± 0.4

3.5 ± 0.3

2.8 ± 1.1

3.1 ± 0.35

Day 30

3 ± 0.5

4.9 ± 0.6

2.8 ± 0.8

3.88 ± 0.9

3.4 ± 0.5

3.4 ± 0.5

3.8 ± 0.4

2.9 ± 0.9

3.3 ± 0.64

Protein (mg/24 h)

Day 0

0.8 ± 0.3

0.8 ± 0.2

0.65 ± 0.2

0.6 ± 0.2

0.6 ± 0.1

0.5 ± 0.4

0.8 ± 0.5

0.7 ± 0.3

0.5 ± 0.2

Day 30

0.9 ± 0.3***

2.35 ± 1.4#

0.92 ± 0.3***

1.3 ± 0.2

0.98 ± 0.4**

1.18 ± 0.4*

1.55 ± 0.5

1.46 ± 0.7

1.48 ± 0.3

Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. All compounds were administered by the intraperitoneal route

# P < 0.05 comparison is made between day 0 and day 30 of the lithiatic group with paired t test; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 indicate significant change in comparison to the lithiatic group (II) by two-way ANOVA with repeated measure, followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test

At the 30th day on stone-inducing regimen, the excretion of phosphate increased in the EG-treated rats, but not to a significant extent. Following treatment with either prophylactic or curative regimens of crocin, urinary phosphate was not significantly altered, as indicated in Table 2.

The urine concentration of citrate was decreased by stone-inducing treatment as compared to day 0 and normal control group (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, respectively), whereas only 40 mg/kg of crocin in the prophylactic regimen significantly (P < 0.01) improved the reduction of renal citrate content (Table 3). Renal stone induction caused significant decrease (P < 0.01) in the magnesium levels of urine in group II (Table 3), which was dose-dependently prevented in the animals receiving a simultaneous treatment with crocin as a prophylactic regimen. In the curative regimen too, a similar pattern was observed on increasing the magnesium contents of urine.
Table 3

Effect of crocin on urinary citrate and magnesium levels in urolithiasis-induced rats

Group (n = 6)

Intact control

Lithiatic or negative control

Positive control (K citrate, 2.5 g/kg)

Prophylactically treated withcrocin (10 mg/kg)

Prophylactically treated with crocin (20 mg/kg)

Prophylactically treated with crocin (40 mg/kg)

Curatively treated with crocin (10 mg/kg)

Curatively treated with crocin (20 mg/kg)

Curatively treated with crocin (40 mg/kg)

Citrate (mg/24 h)

 Day 0

4.32 ± 0.5

3.76 ± 0.4

4.35 ± 0.4

3.9 ± 0.9

3.6 ± 0.7

3.8 ± 0.9

4.1 ± 1.0

3.8 ± 0.1

3.75 ± 0.6

 Day 30

4.3 ± 0.42**

2.7 ± 0.5#

4.43 ± 0.8**

3.9 ± 0.3

3.61 ± 0.8

4.03 ± 0.8*

3.3 ± .1

3.6 ± 1.2

2.9 ± 1.4

Magnesium (mg/24 h)

 Day 0

2.3 ± 0.6

2.1 ± 0.6

2.05 ± 0.5

2.01 ± 0.3

2.2 ± 0.5

1.93 ± 0.3

1.9 ± 0.8

2.01 ± 0.5

2.37 ± 0.3

 Day 30

2.05 ± 0.4**

0.42 ± 0.3##

2.19 ± 0.9*

2.3 ± 0.3**

2.11 ± 1.1***

2.07 ± 1.2***

1.8 ± 0.91

1.93 ± 0.8*

2.2 ± 1.2**

Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. All compounds were administered by the intraperitoneal route

# P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01 comparisons are made between day 0 and day 30 of the lithiatic group (II) with paired t test; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 comparisons are made vs lithiatic group by two-way ANOVA with repeated measure, followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test

Renal stone induction caused urinary protein loss compared to day 0 and normal control group (P < 0.05, P < 0.001 respectively), which was dose-dependently prevented in animals receiving a simultaneous treatment with the applied doses of crocin in the prophylactic regimen (Table 4).
Table 4

Effect of crocin on CaOx crystal deposition number in urolithiasis-induced rats

Group (n = 6)

Intact control

Lithiatic or negative control

Positive control (K citrate, 2.5 g/kg)

Prophylactically treated with crocin (10 mg/kg)

Prophylactically treated with crocin (20 mg/kg)

Prophylactically treated with crocin (40 mg/kg)

Curatively treated with crocin (10 mg/kg)

Curatively treated with crocin (20 mg/kg)

Curatively treated with crocin (40 mg/kg)

CaOx crystal deposition number

4.3 ± 2.9***

727 ± 118

9.8 ± 4.8***

473 ± 121

306.8 ± 107.4*

121.6 ± 63***

587 ± 99

444 ± 62

387 ± 96

Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. All compounds were administered by the intraperitoneal route

* P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001 vs lithiatic group (II), by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test

The uric acid level in urine was not changed to any significant extent after EG-induced renal stone in the lithiatic control group or crocin-treated groups (data not shown).

Effect on lipid peroxidation

Lithogenic treatment enhanced the MDA (P < 0.05) content in the kidney of rats that received normal saline compared to the control animals. A co-administration with crocin (20 and 40 mg/kg) protected against the lipid peroxidation induced by stone-inducing treatment (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Effect of crocin (10, 20, 40 mg/kg, i.p.) on the MDA content in the kidney tissues of male Wistar rats. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 4). Significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test: *P < 0.05, vs. EG-treated group. # P < 0.05, vs. intact control group

Histopathologic findings

On histopathological examination, EG-induced lithiatic rats showed a marked increase in the deposition of calcium oxalate crystals along with interstitial infiltration, as compared to normal control (P < 0.001, Table 4; Fig. 3). However, a simultaneous treatment with 20 and 40 mg/kg crocin as prophylactic regimen significantly reduced the elevated levels of calcium oxalate crystals in the renal tissue (P < 0.001, P < 0.05; respectively, Table 4; Fig. 2). Potassium citrate-fed rats as a positive control group showed a marked decrease in the number of stones as compared to lithiatic animals that received normal saline (P < 0.001).
Fig. 3

Light microscopic architecture and calcium oxalate deposits in the kidney sections in the preventive study. Arrows indicate the crystals in the cortex, tubule and medulla (×40) of rat at 30 days. Kidney sections of (a) intact control, b lithiatic (negative control), c potassium citrate-treated (positive control) rat, and d rats treated with crocin at a dose of 40 mg/kg, e 20 mg/kg and f 10 mg/kg (h and e 400)

The kidney deposits of CaOx crystals were not significantly lower than the respective lithiatic group in animals treated with a curative regimen of crocin (figures not shown).

Discussion

The annual incidence and prevalence of urinary tract stones is increasing, while the age of onset of this disorder is decreasing, probably due to change in dietary lifestyle, habits, diets, hypertension and obesity [30, 31]. Despite recent advances in the treatment of kidney stones with modern techniques such as extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, high cost, several adverse effects and the recurrence of stones limit their usefulness. The low efficacy of current drugs such as alkali citrate and thiazide diuretics, in addition to their lesser tolerability, necessitates the considerable need for finding new drugs [1, 32, 33]. Herbal medicines have shown protective effects in different in vitro and in vivo models of urolithiasis, perhaps due to multiple constituents acting through different pathways [34, 35, 36, 37, 38]. In the present study, the prophylactic and curative effects of crocin, a main pharmacologically active component of C. sativus, were evaluated against ethylene glycol-induced nephrolithiasis in rats. Only male rats were used in this study because the prominence of stone induction is more in male rats compared to female ones. There is a close similarity between the urinary system of these animals and that of humans [3]. It has been reported that female sex hormones can inhibit renal crystal deposition in EG-treated rats through suppressing urinary oxalate excretion and the expression of osteopontin (OPN) [39]. It has been indicated that chronic administration of EG, which is oxidized to oxalic acid by nonspecific dehydrogenase, causes increased renal retention and excretion of oxalate and the formation of renal calculi composed mainly of calcium oxalate [37, 38]. Consistent with previous reports, in the present study, oxalate increased in animals treated with EG for 30 days. It has been demonstrated that hyperoxaluria is a major risk factor in the pathogenesis of renal calculi [40]. The elevated levels of oxalate provide an environment appropriate for calculi induction through forming calcium oxalate crystals. Although decreased levels of urinary PH has been reported in some studies [41], in the present study the PH of urine did not significantly change over a period of 30 days of EG administration, which is in accordance with the results of Green et al. [42], who concluded that metabolic acidosis does not develop in conventional EG treatments, but may result from renal insufficiency induced by oxalate load.

A decreased level of urinary citrate and magnesium was observed in the ethylene glycol-induced urolithic rats. The low levels of citrate and magnesium are important risk factors for stone formation in the kidney [1]. These protective factors prevent crystallization of salts in urine. Citrate complexes with calcium ions and reduces urinary supersaturation of calcium salts. As a result, crystal growth and aggregation are inhibited. Furthermore, citrate increases the activity of some macromolecules in urine, such as Tamm–Horsfall protein that inhibits calcium oxalate aggregation and may reduce the expression of urinary osteopontin (OPN), an important component of the protein matrix of urinary stones. Magnesium can also form complexes with oxalate and decrease supersaturation. In addition, the excretion of citrate in urine has been reported to be elevated after administration of magnesium [1, 43, 44, 45]. The urinary citrate excretion reached normal levels following prophylactic treatment with 40 mg/kg of crocin and potassium citrate as a positive control. Magnesium levels of urine were restored on the supplementation with prophylactic and curative regimens of crocin in a dose-dependent manner. No significantly increased excretion of uric acid and phosphate was observed in the lithiatic group when compared with intact control animals, which is in agreement with the Shirfule et al. study [46]. It might be speculated that increased levels of such factors need more concentration of EG or longer exposure to it.

The present observation showed that protein excretion increased in the lithogenic treatment with ethylene glycol, which is as a result of proximal tubular dysfunction [47, 48]. Urinary protein loss was brought down significantly by the prophylactic regimen of crocin (20 and 40 mg/kg), but not at a low dose of 10 mg/kg of crocin.

There was limited or no crystal formation in animals receiving 20 and 40 mg/kg of prophylactic treatment of crocin.

It has been indicated that hyperoxaluria induces peroxidative damage to the renal tubular membrane surface (lipid peroxidation), which in turn leads to the production of superoxide and hydroxyl free radicals, oxidative stress-induced cell membrane rupture, cell death (apoptosis) and subsequent development of calcium oxalate urinary stone generation [49, 50]. The involvement of oxidative stress has also been demonstrated in the kidneys of stone-forming patients [51]. Therefore, a reduction of renal oxidative stress could be an effective therapeutic approach [52]. Antioxidants such as vitamin E, catechin and selenium have been reported to prevent hyperoxaluria-induced calcium oxalate crystal deposition [49, 53]. It was observed that oxidative damage as reflected from the increased level of MDA, a marker of oxidative injury, significantly increased in the kidneys of the stone-forming group; however, prophylactic crocin at the dose of 20 and 40 mg/kg attenuated the content of MDA in the kidneys of lithogenic rats. Supplementation with potassium citrate also improved urinary citrate and magnesium and reduced oxalate and crystals number; however, it did not reduce the urinary lipid peroxidation product, MDA.

It is suggested that the nephroprotective effects of crocin in the EG-induced urolithiasis model could be through maintaining balance between stone promoters and inhibitors, reducing deposition of CaOX crystals from the kidney and preventing the EG-induced lipid peroxidation.

Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of this promising agent have been shown in various studies [19, 54, 55]. For example, an aqueous extract of saffron and crocin prevented renal ischemia–reperfusion induced oxidative injury through antioxidant effect in rats [56]. Following cisplatin-induced acute renal failure in mice, crocin elicited a protective effect by suppressing relative oxidative stress [15]. Thushara et al. [57] showed that platelet aggregation induced by oxidative stress was inhibited by crocin through an anti-apoptotic pathway. In a study conducted by Jnaneshwari et al. [58], cyclophosphamide-induced organ toxicity was prevented by crocin through modulating antioxidant status and inflammatory cytokines. Crocin prevented apoptosis following retinal ischemia/reperfusion damage through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway [59]. In a study by Xu et al. [60], crocin inhibited xylene-induced ear edema in mice and carrageenan-induced paw edema as well as production of lipopolysaccharide-induced prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in rats. Crocin and crocetin reduced LPS-induced nitric oxide (NO) release, TNF-α, IL-1β, intracellular ROS and NF-κB activation from cultured rat brain microglial cells [61]. Crocin showed antioxidant activity in the liver and kidney of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats [62]. Recently, crocin has been reported to protect against beryllium chloride toxicity in rats through antioxidant effect and enhancing gene expression of antioxidant enzymes in a study by El-Beshbishy HA and co-workers [63].

Considering that infection is probably associated with the urolithiasis process, antimicrobial activity may also contribute to the antilithiatic effect of crocin [64].

The safety profile of crocin in animals or humans has been reported in some studies. In a study conducted by Wang et al. on rats, a very low toxicity of crocin was reported. A daily dose of crocin (50 mg/kg for 8 days) did not affect hepatic function; however, a higher dosage of 100 mg/kg for 2 weeks caused hepatic damage and black pigmentation, but a lower dose of 100 mg/kg for 40 days did not. Rats receiving 1 % of crocin dyes for 4 months elicited mild hepatic functional disorders and pigmentation, which was completely reversible [65].

A recent study, evaluating biochemical, hematological and pathological criteria in mice and rats treated with crocin (up to 3 g, p.o. and i.p. as well as 15–180 mg/kg, i.p.), showed no damage to any major organs in the body. In a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial on volunteers treated with crocin tablets (20 mg) for a duration of 1 month, no major adverse events were observed during the trial [66].

As, at the doses tested in the present study, crocin showed its effect in the early stages of stone development and did not reverse the established crystal deposits in the curative study, it is helpful to prevent the recurrence of the disease, one of the biggest challenges in urolithic patients. Hence, consumption of this agent in the prophylactic regimens might be a good strategy.

One of the limitations in this study is that Ca2+, a facilitating factor for nucleation and precipitation of calcium oxalate, was not evaluated in our study. However, considering that urinary oxalate execration is a more important factor in the induction of CaOx deposition [42, 52], the elevated levels of this factor could be a reason to guarantee the formation of CaOx calculi.

In addition, intraperitoneal administration of crocin was used in this study. Considering that oral administration of drugs is the preferred route of drug delivery [67], further studies are necessary to examine the effect of oral administration of the effective doses of crocin in this study on the biochemical parameters in urine and blood.

It should be noted that orally administered crocin is not absorbed either after a single dose or repeated dose, due to hydrolysis of crocin to crocetin in the intestinal tract [68]. Hence, crocetin might be a better compound for further studies in this topic.

Conclusion

Taken together, it has been suggested that crocin, the main carotenoid constituent of C. sativus with a wide spectrum of therapeutic potentials, could be useful as either alternative or an adjunctive therapy in the management of kidney stones. Antioxidant activity seems to be an important factor in mediating the antilithiatic effects of this compound. However, further studies are required to determine the exact mechanisms by which crocin prevents EG-induced nephrolithiasis.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the Council of Research, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References

  1. 1.
    Moe OW (2006) Kidney stones: pathophysiology and medical management. Lancet 367:333–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson CM, Wilson DM, O’Fallon WM, Malek RS, Kurland LT (1979) Renal stone epidemiology: a 25-year study in Rochester, Minnesota. Kidney Int 16:624–631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khan S (1997) Animal models of kidney stone formation: an analysis. World J Urol 15:236–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wasserstein AG (1998) Nephrolithiasis: acute management and prevention. Dis Mon 44:196–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Butterweck V, Khan SR (2009) Herbal medicines in the management of urolithiasis: alternative or complementary? Planta Med 75:1095–1103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abdullaev F (1993) Biological effects of saffron. BioFactors 4:83–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abdullaev F, Espinosa-Aguirre J (2004) Biomedical properties of saffron and its potential use in cancer therapy and chemoprevention trials. Cancer Detect Prev 28:426–432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zargari A (1990) Medicinal plants. University Press, Tehran, pp 672–675Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hosseinzadeh H, Nassiri-Asl M (2012) Avicenna’s (Ibn Sina) the canon of medicine and saffron (Crocus sativus): a review. Phytother Res 2013(27):475–483Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mousavi SZ, Bathaie SZ (2011) Historical uses of saffron: identifying potential new avenues for modern research. Avicenna J Phytomed 1:57–66Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abe K, Saito H (2000) Effects of saffron extract and its constituent crocin on learning behaviour and long-term potentiation. Phytother Res 14:149–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rastgoo M, Hosseinzadeh H, Alavizadeh H, Abbasi A, Ayati Z, Jaafari MR (2013) Antitumor activity of PEGylated nanoliposomes containing crocin in mice bearing C26 colon carcinoma. Planta Med 79:447–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hosseinzadeh H, Shamsaie F, Mehri S (2009) Antioxidant activity of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of Crocus sativus L. stigma and its bioactive constituents, crocin and safranal. Pharmacogn Mag 5:419–421Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sheng L, Qian Z, Shi Y, Yang L, Xi L, Zhao B, Xu X, Ji H (2008) Crocetin improves the insulin resistance induced by high-fat diet in rats. Br J Pharmacol 154:1016–1024PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Naghizadeh B, Boroushaki MT, Vahdati Mashhadian N, Mansouri SMT (2008) Protective effects of crocin against cisplatin-induced acute renal failure and oxidative stress in rats. Iran Biomed J 12:93–100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hosseinzadeh H, Sadeghnia HR, Rahimi A (2008) Effect of safranal on extracellular hippocampal levels of glutamate and aspartate during kainic acid treatment in anesthetized rats. Planta Med 74:1441–1445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hosseinzadeh H, Karimi G, Niapoor M (2003) Antidepressant effect of Crocus sativus L. stigma extracts and their constituents, crocin and safranal, in mice. ISHS 2003:435–445Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang Y, Han T, Zhu Y, Zheng CJ, Ming QL, Rahman K, Qin LP (2010) Antidepressant properties of bioactive fractions from the extract of Crocus sativus L. J Nat Med 64:24–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hosseinzadeh H, Noraei NB (2009) Anxiolytic and hypnotic effect of Crocus sativus aqueous extract and its constituents, crocin and safranal, in mice. Phytother Res 23:768–774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hosseinzadeh H, Younesi HM (2002) Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of Crocus sativus L. stigma and petal extracts in mice. BMC Pharmacol 2:7–12PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hosseinzadeh H, Shariaty V (2007) Anti-nociceptive effect of safranal, a constituent of Crocus sativus (saffron), in mice. Pharmacologyonline 2:498–503Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Amin B, Hosseinzadeh H (2012) Evaluation of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of saffron, Crocus sativus L., and its constituents, safranal and crocin in allodynia and hyperalgesia induced by chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain in rats. Fitoterapia 83:888–895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hadizadeh F, Mohajeri S, Seifi M (2010) Extraction and purification of crocin from saffron stigmas employing a simple and efficient crystallization method. Pak J Biol Sci 13:691–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lari P, Abnous K, Imenshahidi M, Rashedinia M, Razavi M, Hosseinzadeh H (2013) Evaluation of diazinon-induced hepatotoxicity and protective effects of crocin. Tox Indust Health (Epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    National Research Council (1997) Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Natl Acad Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ettinger B, Pak CYC, Citron JT, Thomas C, Adams-Huet B, Vangessel A (1997) Potassium–magnesium citrate is an effective prophylaxis against recurrent calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. J Urol 158:2069–2073PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lipschitz WL, Hadidian Z, Kerpcsar A (1943) Bioassay of diuretics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 79:97–110Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tsai CH, Chen YC, Chen LD, Pan TC, Ho CY, Lai MT, Tsai FJ, Chen WC (2008) A traditional Chinese herbal antilithic formula, Wulingsan, effectively prevents the renal deposition of calcium oxalate crystal in ethylene glycol-fed rats. Urol Res 36:17–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Uchiyama M, Mihara M (1978) Determination of malonaldehyde precursor in tissues by thiobarbituric acid test. Anal Biochem 86:271–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Frassetto L, Kohlstadt I (2011) Treatment and prevention of kidney stones: an update. Am Fam Physician 84:1234–1242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Obligado SH, Goldfarb DS (2008) The association of nephrolithiasis with hypertension and obesity: a review. Am J Hypertens 21:257–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Park S, Pearle MS (2007) Pathophysiology and management of calcium stones. Urol Clin North Am 34:323–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mattle D, Hess B (2005) Preventive treatment of nephrolithiasis with alkali citrate, a critical review. Urol Res 33:73–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gandhi M, Aggarwal M, Puri S, Singla SK (2013) Prophylactic effect of coconut water (Cocosnucifera L.) on ethylene glycol induced nephrocalcinosis in male Wistar rat. Int Braz J Urol 39:108–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Atmani F, Khan SR (2000) Effects of an extract from Herniaria hirsuta on calcium oxalate crystallization in vitro. BJU Int 85:621–625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Karadi RV, Gadge NB, Alagawadi KR, Savadi RV (2006) Effect of Moringa oleifera Lam. root-wood on ethylene glycol induced urolithiasis in rats. J Ethnopharmacol 105:306–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hosseinzadeh H, Khooei AR, Khashayarmanesh Z, Motamed-Shariaty V (2010) Antiurolithiatic activity of Pinus eldarica medw fruits aqueous extract in rats. Urol J 7:232–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gilani AH, Rahman AU (2005) Trends in ethnopharmocology. J Ethnopharmacol 100:43–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Iguchi M, Takamura C, Umekawa T, Kurita T, Kohri K (1999) Inhibitory effects of female sex hormones on urinary stone formation in rats. Kidney Int 56:479–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Borghi L, Meschi T, Amato F, Briganti A, Novarini A, Giannini A (1996) Urinary volume, water and recurrences in idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis: a 5-year randomized prospective study. J Urol 155:839–843PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tayefi-Nasrabadi H, Sadigh-Eteghad S, Aghdam Z (2012) The effects of the hydroalcohol extract of Rosa canina L. fruit on experimentally nephrolithiasic Wistar rats. Phytother Res 26:78–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Green ML, Hatch M, Freel RW (2005) Ethylene glycol induces hyperoxaluria without metabolic acidosis in rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 289:536–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zuckerman JM, Assimos DG (2009) Hypocitraturia: pathophysiology and medical management. Rev Urol 11:134–144PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kok DJ, Papapoulos SE (1993) Physicochemical considerations in the development and prevention of calcium oxalate urolithiasis. Bone Miner 20:1–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cupisti A, Morelli E, Lupetti S, Meola M, Barsotti G (2008) Low urine citrate excretion as main risk factor for recurrent calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis in males. Nephron 61:73–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shirfule AL, Racharla V, Qadri SS, Khandare AL (2013) Exploring antiurolithic effects of gokshuradi polyherbal ayurvedic formulation in ethylene-glycol-induced urolithic rats. Evid Based Complement Altern Med 2013:763720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Niederstadt C, Lerche L, Steinhoff J (1996) Proteinuria in ethylene glycol-induced acute renal failure. Nephron 73:316–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Divakar K, Pawar AT, Chandrasekhar SB, Dighe SB, Divakar G (2010) Protective effect of the hydro-alcoholic extract of Rubia cordifolia roots against ethylene glycol induced urolithiasis in rats. Food Chem Toxicol 48:1013–1018PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Thamilselvan S, Khan SR, Menon M (2003) Oxalate and calcium oxalate mediated free radical toxicity in renal epithelial cells: effect of antioxidants. Urol Res 31:3–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Selvam R (2002) Calcium oxalate stone disease: role of lipid peroxidation and antioxidants. Urol Res 30:35–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Huang HS, Ma MC, Chen CF, Chen J (2003) Lipid peroxidation and its correlations with urinary levels of oxalate, citric acid, and osteopontin in patients with renal calcium oxalate stones. Urology 62:1123–1128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Khan SR, Kok DJ (2004) Modulators of urinary stone formation. Frontiers Biosci 9:1450–1482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Santhosh Kumar M, Selvam R (2003) Supplementation of vitamin E and selenium prevents hyperoxaluria in experimental urolithic rats. J Nutr Biochem 14:306–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Moraga AR, Rambla JL, Ahrazem O, Granell A, Gomez-Gomez L (2009) Metabolite and target transcript analyses during Crocus sativus stigma development. Phytochemistry 70:1009–1016PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Alavizadeh SH, Hosseinzadeh H (2013) Bioactivity assessment and toxicity of crocin: a comprehensive review. Food Chem Toxicol 64:65–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hosseinzadeh H, Sadeghnia HR, Ziaee T, Danaee A (2005) Protective effect of aqueous saffron extract (Crocus sativus L.) and crocin, its active constituent, on renal ischemia-reperfusion-induced oxidative damage in rats. J Pharm Pharm Sci 8:387–393PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Thushara RM, Hemshekhar M, Santhosh MS, Jnaneshwari S, Nayaka SC, Naveen S, Kemparaju K, Girish KS (2013) crocin, a dietary additive protects platelets from oxidative stress-induced apoptosis and inhibits platelet aggregation. Mol Cell Biochem 373:73–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Jnaneshwari S, Hemshekhar M, Santhosh MS, Sunitha K, Thushara R, Thirunavukkarasu C, Kemparaju K, Girish KS (2013) crocin, a dietary colorant mitigates cyclophosphamide-induced organ toxicity by modulating antioxidant status and inflammatory cytokines. J Pharm Pharmacol 65:604–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Qi Y, Chen L, Zhang L, Liu WB, Chen XY, Yang XG (2013) crocin prevents retinal ischaemia/reperfusion injury-induced apoptosis in retinal ganglion cells through the PI3K/AKT signalling pathway. Exp Eye Res 107:44–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Xu G-L, Li G, Ma H-P, Zhong H, Liu F, Ao G-Z (2009) Preventive effect of crocin in inflamed animals and in LPS-challenged RAW 264.7 cells. J Agric Food Chem 57:8325–8330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Nam KN, Park YM, Jung HJ, Lee JY, Min BD, Park SU, Jung WS, Cho KH, Park JH, Kang I, Hong JW, Lee EH (2010) Anti-inflammatory effects of crocin and crocetin in rat brain microglial cells. Eur J Pharmacol 648:110–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Rajaei Z, Hadjzadeh MA, Nemati H, Hosseini M, Ahmadi M, Shafiee S (2013) Antihyperglycemic and antioxidant activity of crocin in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J Med Food 16:206–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    El-Beshbishy HA, Hassan MH, Aly HA, Doghish AS, Alghaithy AA (2012) crocin “saffron” protects against beryllium chloride toxicity in rats through diminution of oxidative stress and enhancing gene expression of antioxidant enzymes. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 83:47–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Moghaddam MN (2010) In vitro antibacterial activity of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) extract and its two major constituents against Helicobacter pylori. Planta Med 76:496Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Wang CJ, Hwang LS, Lin JK (1984) Reversible hepatic black pigmentation and enzyme alteration induced by prolonged feeding of high dose of crocin dyes in rats. Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B 8:246–253PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Mohamadpour AH, Ayati Z, Parizadeh MR, Rajbai O, Hosseinzadeh H (2013) Safety evaluation of crocin (a constituent of saffron) tablets in healthy volunteers. Iran J Basic Med Sci 16:39–46PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Patravale VB, Date AA, Kulkarni RM (2004) Nanosuspensions: a promising drug delivery strategy. J Pharm Pharmacol 56:827–840PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Xi Liang, Qian Z, Peng Du, Jian Fu (2007) Pharmacokinetic properties of crocin (crocetin digentiobiose ester) following oral administration in rats. Phytomedicine 14:633–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fatemeh Abbasi Ghaeni
    • 1
  • Bahareh Amin
    • 2
  • Alireza Timcheh Hariri
    • 3
  • Naser Tayyebi Meybodi
    • 4
  • Hossein Hosseinzadeh
    • 5
  1. 1.Pharmaceutical Research Center, School of PharmacyMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
  2. 2.Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, School of MedicineSabzevar University of Medical SciencesKhorasanIran
  3. 3.Medical Toxicology Research Center, School of MedicineMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
  4. 4.Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Research Center for Skin Diseases and Cutaneous Leishmanaisis, Emam Reza HospitalMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
  5. 5.Department of Pharmacodynamics and Toxicology, Pharmaceutical Research Center, School of PharmacyMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran

Personalised recommendations